Followers

Thursday, August 30, 2012

MovieViews- Archipelago



Hello Viewers and Classwatchers, time for another weekly dose of MovieViews. This week I watched the British dark comedy, Archipelago. This movie has been on the list of many fans of Tom Hiddleston and most Anglophiles hold this with high regard. I do like some British Comedy films such as ensemble hits like Love Actually and witty, dark humor like Monty Python and The Full Monty; I am also a fan of Mr. Hiddleston after his portrayl of the trickster god and brother of Thor, Loki, in the Marvel films. But even with that much behind it, I can't stand pretentious British films; one may think American Indie films are high up there, but British goes far and beyond with uppercrust snobbish tones and First World problem angst that makes me want to bang my head against a bring wall. But I decided to give it a watch and here's the real review.

The Review

I will say this right now; I expected these feelings for this movie and how I felt afterwards. If you love complaining and whispering, you will love this film; if not, then you will be like me and cry tears of boredom. Archipelago is a pretentious, whiny, and boring film; I didn't even know what was going on half the time of the film's viewing. The director, Joanna Hogg, broke no new grounds with this film and it is rather forgetful for a film that you are supposed to relate to. Tom Hiddleston is also forgettable in his role as a emotionally distance college student about to do work in Africa, a role that has been done many times before, but could be interesting if perhaps he went through a complete mental breakdown. I couldn't even finish the movie all at once, but break it apart in days.

The plot of Archipelago is a simple family vacation film setting in the Scilly Islands. Tom Hiddleston plays as Edward, a missionary going to Africa for volunteer work, seeing his family on holiday before he leaves. The family is dysfunctional and constantly getting into fights. They try to make things right for possibly their last holiday together as a family, even inviting a helping hand with a hired cook and a painting teacher to bring some light on to the vacation. It's your typical story about how a family is supposed to come together when they need each other.

The acting was melodramatic and full of whispers. I find that a movie doesn't do its job whenever you have to strain to listen to an argument and still have no idea what the characters said. The conversations went on for far too long with the same shot and that draws on the movie far longer than it needs to. Tom Hiddleston is the lost, misunderstood soul trying to make sense of his family; his acting is fine but the directing and writing was so bland and monotone that he couldn't flesh out his character enough. The others acting in the film don't add anything new, just more dysfunctional, whiny character cut-outs.

The one thing this film does have is beautiful, although lazy cinematography and fitting music. The film is mostly in wide shots and the scenes are very pretty with a light filter over the shots. Even though, some shots stay for too long, at least there is stuff to look at as well. There were no memorable scenes except for one involving a puppet, worked by Tom Hiddleston's character, which was adorable, but most of the scene was once again in a single, boring shot. The film had so much potential with the visuals and the film is pretty, but still dull with the camera work. The music is also the typical classical music, but I think it sets the melodramatic mood represented in the film.

Overall, Archipelago is a boring, pretentious, and quiet film. The camera work is horrible, some scenes don't make sense or were totally unnecessary. The characters are dull and self-centered to the point where you dislike them greatly. The only reason I would recommend this is to see Loki working a badger puppet to his mother. And I can help you there! Don't see this, unless you want to fall asleep.


Thursday, August 23, 2012

Media Literacy Topic- Media Survey

Hello Again Readers!

Today we are going to analyze my media habits! Sounds like fun, right?

As the project in my Video Production class, we were meant to keep a log on all the different media we use during our own times. For me, my own choices are limited for my own tastes; for instance, my use of television is going to be low due to the fact of I do not watch TV often, if at all. So we wrote the log of all the media we used and now you shall find out the what's and which's that describe my habits.

I use a small variety of media on a daily basis:

Facebook.com: 1hr a day, except on Wednesday which almost tripled to 2hrs. and 50 minutes. This week I had spent 8 hours and twenty five minutes on facebook.

TV: 3 hours all together, the most being on Monday for 1 hr and 30 minutes.

Youtube.com: Roughly six hours a day, give or take a few minutes. Except on Wednesday which was only two hours.

Radio: Only had to listen to it in the car and my roommate's stereo. 1hr and 15 minutes in the car all week and 50 minutes with the stereo radio during the week.

Tumblr.com: I do not have a blog on there, but I do "stalk" the website 30 minutes per day except Wednesday was ten minutes less than Facebook at 2 hrs. and 40 minutes.

I have played any video games during the week and maybe had less than ten minutes of advertisements on the street as I never really left campus.

What does your media say about you?

It says that I need to get out more and that I spend too much time on the computer. Ha, ha.

Which media do you trust and why?

I obviously trust the internet and the websites on there. I am too focused in my work on the computer that I don't use anything else, not that I don't trust them, but for the fact that I just don't need a radio and TV blasting on at the same time as I work. 

Which media do you enjoy the most and why?

Computer and internet are what I enjoy because I can do everything I want on there. Listen to music, watch movies or videos, and play games if I desire. You have the most freedom on the internet to do anything you wish. You can't interact with the television (Dora doesn't count) and radio does have the perk of using the imagination, but then songs you dislike come on and you don't enjoy the media anymore.

Are you willing to broaden your exposure to different media?

Of course I'm willing, give me something that sparks my interest and I will be all for watch/viewing/listening to the media. There is good with staying in your comfort zone, but it does get boring after a while. I have my dislikes and most remain firm, but some forms of media have changed my interests greatly for the better. I am not a fan of sports films, heavy metal, and petty romance stories, but there have been a few to surprise me and I actually enjoy very much.

Always keep an open mind.





MovieViews- Sita Sings the Blues Review



"The Greatest Break-Up Story Ever Told"


Hello Film Fanatics and Reviewers alike. This is my first movie review and I'd like to start with something a little bit different. Over the course of the summer, I heard of this tiny Indian animated movie called Sita Sings the Blues and was intrigued by the animation I've seen clips on. I am a fan of unconventional styles of animation (meaning anything outside of Disney and 3D animated films); one of my favorite films of all time is Marjane Satrapi's Persepolis (which if you haven't seen look it up). So I finally found the film, but didn't get the chance to watch it until now. So now, my own thoughts and feelings on Nina Paley's Sita Sings the Blues

The Review

Sita Sings the Blues is an independent, animated film covering stories from the Ramayana, the Sanskrit epic about a banished prince named Rama and his beautiful and coveted wife, Sita, and also the divorce of Nina Paley and her husband. These two stories run parallel to each other and teach lessons derived from these stories about love, loss, and sacrifice. As these stories are being told, there are interludes from three Indian shadow puppets providing background information and comical insights on the stories and also musical snippets by the late blues singer, Annette Sanshaw, that progress the story of Rama and Sita. Voices are provided by Indian voice actors, namely Anseem Chhabra, Bhavana Nagulapally, and Manish Acharya as the shadow puppet narrators. Nina Paley directed and provided the animations to all segments and stories and it is fantastic work! The different styles she portrays is beautiful and the interesting choice of playing 1920's blues in an Indian story works well with the quirky animations. The stories are deep and portray feelings and doubts we have with every relationship, even when it takes place in Hindu mythology.

The plot is just as was described in the last paragraph. Taking out all the mythical stories, magic, and gods, the whole movie can be summed up as a "break-up story". In the Ramanyana part of the film, Sita's fidelity is challenged by her husband, Rama, after she is kidnapped by the evil king, Ravana. She is pure and loving to her husband and through all the trials put against her, she remains faithful and gave birth to his twin sons. However, Rama is still firm in believing her infidelity and continues to push her away in anger. Running parallel to this story is Nina Paley's divorce. It starts where her husband leaves for India on a business trip and he creates excuses to stay in the country and prolonging his trip back home to his wife. Nina soon follows him and what begins the downhill spiral of their marriage. As previously stated, shadow puppets are seen between the segments telling the history of the Ramayana and give their own insights and tellings of the stories. This can be argued as filler, but the shadow puppets are educational to viewers new to Hinduism.

The acting is rather flat when it comes to the stories. When the actors are speaking, their tone is flat and its evident they are reading lines, but I believe this is intentional to make the scenes appear to come directly from the book. The shadow puppets, however, have an extemporaneous form of speech. Half the dialogue seems to come from their own minds as if they are remembering the stories and not reading them from a book; it is more intimate and you feel that a story is actually being told. Overall the acting was average, but passable for the style of the film. This movie is more visual heavy and music plays key here

I cannot stress enough of how beautiful the animation is in this film.  The styles change with the stories with classical Indian art with the narrative and shadow puppet portions of the film and simplistic cartoons for Nina's story and the musical segments. The animation separates the two stories, but at the same time works cohesively for the film as they tell the same lessons. The music is split between two genres: Indian and 1920's blues. Annette Hanshaw is the singer during Sita's "monologues". Her voice is sultry, but at the same time sad and full of want which matches Sita's mood and personality. There is one segment which doesn't make sense, but it's visually interesting. There is no plot, but it features Indian dancers and bright colors flashing along with traditional Hindu instruments. There is no way to describe it other than incredibly trippy. Overall, the visuals are great and really put the story together.



I recommend this film to anyone who wants to learn more about the Indian culture, especially the Hinduism and The Ramayana. It's visually pleasing and you will get a more personal insight of love and how sometimes we just have to let go of the former loves of our life. It's also free to view! You can view the movie in its entirety on either Youtube or Nina Paley's site: www.sitasingstheblues.com. Go watch it; you have literally nothing to lose.

Happy Viewing!